|
Minnesota DHIA News | |
| A PUBLICATION OF MINNESOTA DHIA Volume4, Issue 7 | July 2004 |
Milk Quality Tops for June 2004 sample days
(SCC in 1,000s)|
JOEL & NICOLE GROSS |
HILLMAN |
45 |
MARK KLEHR |
BELLE PLAINE |
97 |
|
|
DAN MICHAELIS |
WINONA |
45 |
JAMES HAUSCHILDT |
ELLSWORTH |
98 |
|
|
DAN AND JOLENE SCHLANGEN |
EDEN VALLEY |
54 |
EARL FELLING |
ALBANY |
98 |
|
|
JOHN NATHE |
MELROSE |
59 |
BRIAN LIBBESMEIER |
WATKINS |
98 |
|
|
LYNDON LICHTY |
STEWARTVILLE |
64 |
CHARLES NELSON |
CUMBERLAND |
98 |
|
|
KEVIN ANDERSON |
BATTLE LAKE |
66 |
RON+BRAD AUSMUS |
HINCKLEY |
99 |
|
|
DAVID SCHUUR |
SAUK CENTRE |
66 |
PHIL SUESS |
GRAND MEADOW |
100 |
|
|
RUIS-ING SUN DAIRY |
MILACA |
68 |
ROBERT + FAWN STAUB |
MAZEPPA |
100 |
|
|
DAVE SCHROEDER |
JANESVILLE |
69 |
CHAIN O LAKES DAIRY |
BLUE EARTH |
101 |
|
|
DAVID MANN |
NEWYORKMILLS |
69 |
SCHEFERS BROS |
PAYNESVILLE |
101 |
|
|
MANUEL JERGER + SONS |
BARNESVILLE |
70 |
BREEZY WILLOWS DAIRY |
DOVER |
102 |
|
|
BOB & TERRI KETCHUM |
UTICA |
70 |
WAYNE KOEPP |
BELLE PLAINE |
103 |
|
|
DAVID BUCK |
DENNISON |
71 |
DAVID AND MARIE BENDIX |
DEER CREEK |
103 |
|
|
DANIEL HALLBERG |
KANDIYOHI |
72 |
DONALD + PETER SETTERGREN |
DASSEL |
104 |
|
|
LOWELL BAKKEDAHL |
SARGEANT |
74 |
JASON SMELTER |
FOLEY |
104 |
|
|
GERALD + LISA BURG |
FREEPORT |
76 |
JASON + NANCY BACHMANN |
FRAZEE |
104 |
|
|
C & C DAIRY |
PARKERS PRAIRIE |
79 |
SELMER & JOEL NELSON |
BARRON |
105 |
|
|
DUANE, CAROL, DENNIS HAIBY |
PELICAN RAPIDS |
79 |
FRANK PATRICK |
RICE |
105 |
|
|
RAY+CHERYL SEIBERT |
SEBEKA |
79 |
WAYNE & KATHERINE VOTH |
LEWISTON |
106 |
|
|
NORBERT BROWN |
GREY EAGLE |
80 |
RICHARD RISLOW |
LEWISTON |
106 |
|
|
PRAHL DAIRY |
SUNBURG |
81 |
DELBERT KRUEGER |
ALEXANDRIA |
106 |
|
|
AIMEE FINLEY |
ST. CHARLES |
82 |
RANDY GRABAU |
SPRING VALLEY |
106 |
|
|
DONALD + DARLENE MATROS |
PIERZ |
83 |
WARREN & PAT HOPPE |
ROLLINGSTONE |
107 |
|
|
JIM KULINSKI |
LESTER PRAIRIE |
83 |
PETER & MARK HENDRICKSON |
MENAHGA |
107 |
|
|
KENNETH ANDERSON |
SPRING GROVE |
84 |
RICK HEUER |
LESTER PRAIRIE |
108 |
|
|
STEVE H REMIGER |
WOODLAKE |
85 |
HARVEY HEIMER |
ADAMS |
109 |
|
|
SCHREIBER BROS |
RUSHFORD |
86 |
STAN WURTZBERGER |
NEW ULM |
109 |
|
|
JERRY + BEV POHLMANN |
GREY EAGLE |
87 |
GATEWOOD FARM |
WILLMAR |
110 |
|
|
BOB & LIZ KROCAK |
MONTGOMERY |
88 |
DAVE + KATHY SKIBA |
NORTH BRANCH |
111 |
|
|
GLENN BERANEK |
NEW ULM |
88 |
DALE AND JULIE SCHWARTZ |
ARLINGTON |
112 |
|
|
CHAD NEESER |
RICE LAKE |
88 |
RIVERVIEW ENTERPRISES |
FOLEY |
112 |
|
|
PAUL & MARY ZIMMERMAN |
BROOTEN |
89 |
DENNIS PLAETZ DAIRY |
LUCAN |
112 |
|
|
DYNAMITE HOLSTEINS |
CHETEK |
90 |
KB HILLSIDE DAIRY |
GREEN ISLE |
113 |
|
|
STACY & JULIE MILLER |
PLAINVIEW |
90 |
GARY & DANA BAER |
UTICA |
113 |
|
|
RONALD/HARFF |
WATKINS |
90 |
STEVE + LORRIE HELLMANN |
HOLDINGFORD |
113 |
|
|
JIM STORTZ |
MABEL |
90 |
MIKE MENZE |
OTTERTAIL |
115 |
|
|
EUGENE BISEK |
MAHNOMEN |
93 |
DENNIS FISCHER |
PIERZ |
115 |
|
|
KIMM'S DAIRY |
PELICAN RAPIDS |
93 |
TWIN OAKS DAIRY |
PELICAN RAPIDS |
115 |
|
|
KIDMAN DAIRY |
BALATON |
93 |
SCHUELER FARMS |
WILLMAR |
117 |
|
|
KEITH MAUS |
MORRIS |
93 |
JIM + PAM LARSON |
WINONA |
117 |
|
|
VERYL & CAROL BECKER |
GLENCOE |
93 |
DAVID EIBENSTEINER |
SAUK CENTRE |
117 |
|
|
ORVILLE FENSKE |
OTTERTAIL |
94 |
NOSBUSH DAIRY |
FAIRFAX |
118 |
|
|
ROSEY FUTURE HOLSTEINS |
ISLE |
94 |
KEITH & DAWN BLOM |
CHANDLER |
118 |
|
|
JOPPS CENTURY FARMS |
MAYER |
95 |
ANDY KRONEBUSCH |
WINONA |
118 |
|
|
GARY BECKMAN |
PENNOCK |
95 |
RICK + JOE FLANDERS |
GROVE CITY |
118 |
|
|
DAVID SMITH |
DENT |
95 |
DOUG + KATHY CORRIGAN |
FOLEY |
119 |
|
|
MIKE + ROSIE ZEIG |
SLEEPY EYE |
95 |
JEFF BLENKER |
ALBANY |
119 |
|
|
RANDY FRIESE |
BURTRUM MN. |
96 |
ROBERT RAMONA WIPPLER |
PARKERS PRAIRIE |
119 |
|
|
DAVE CORBETT |
CLAYTON |
96 |
LARRY BRAEM |
SACRED HEART |
119 |
|
Minnesota DHIA policy for the 2004 testing year requires herds have 11 tests during calendar 2004 in order for herd data to be published in the Minnesota DHIA Annual Summary information. |
Tiffany Fuhr -- -- Rookie Of The Year
Minnesota DHIA recently recognized Field Representative, Tiffany Fuhr for her exceptional performance by being named the "Rookie of TheYear" for 2003.
Tiffany Fuhr from Redwood Falls, has been a Field Representative for Minnesota DHIA since April, 2003 in Redwood, Renville and Yellow Medicine Counties. Currently Tiffany makes visits to 22 herds each month. Tiffany also has lent a hand in other areas of DHIA. She has attended trade shows to promote DHIA services and also has been involved in a Dairy Comp 305 software online training class sponsored by the University of Minnesota.
In her spare time, Tiffany enjoys raising and showing her horses. Thank you Tiffany for providing excellent service to our customers.
Pat Clark Reaches Milestone
Our sincere congratulations go out to our hard working and dedicated Minnesota DHIA Field Representative, Pat Clark of Austin, who is celebrating her 25th anniversary with DHIA this month. Please join us in
extending our thanks to her for all the good work she does.
For Sale
To list Cows, Heifers, or Hay for Sale call Nancy
Zander at 800-827-3442.
|
For DHIA Scholarship Applications , please call 800-827-3442 or visit www.dhia.org, and pick the "about us" icon. Last year there were 15 Scholarships of $500 each awarded to MnDHIA members, their children, or children of DHIA employees. Applications are due by October 1. |
% Cull Rate : - This statistic can be found on the "Consultant Summary" side of the Herd Summary on tan paper. It is the number of animals that left the herd in the past 365 days divided by the number of animals in the herd, plus the number of animals that left the herd. It tells you the number of animals you have had in your herd in the last 365 days to achieve current herd size.
% Cull Rate = # of Cow left Herd / ( # of total Cows + # of Cows left Herd)
ID – it’s gonna be big!
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the National Animal Identification System
1. What is the NAIS?
USDA has accepted The U.S. Animal Identification Plan (USAIP) to define the standards and framework for implementing and maintaining a phased-in national animal identification system for the United States. USDA has changed the name to the National Animal Identification System (NAIS).
2. Why is this program needed?
A national animal identification system is needed to help protect American animal agriculture. This national plan, which identifies all food animals and livestock, will enhance disease preparedness by allowing the U.S. to identify any animals exposed to disease and will facilitate stopping the spread of that disease. In addition, it will provide benefits to industry in terms of market access and consumer demand. The NAIS will uphold the U.S.’s reputation for having a safe food supply and will promote continued confidence in agricultural or livestock products. Having a working system that allows for traceback and trace forward to all premises that had direct contact with an animal with a foreign animal disease within 48 hours of discovery will reduce the financial and social impacts of such a disease.
5. What are the benefits for producers in adopting the NAIS?
The adoption of a national identification system will help secure the health of the national herd. The program will provide producers and animal health officials with the infrastructure to improve efforts in current disease eradication and control, protect against foreign animal disease outbreaks and provide infrastructure to address threats from deliberate introduction of disease.
The industry may integrate the standards and technologies defined in the NAIS with their management systems and performance recording programs. The utilization of the same ID technologies for both regulatory and industry programs allows for the development of a more cost effective and user-friendly system for the producer. Producers can also benefit from additional animal identification information obtained to improve production efficiencies and add value to their products. However, the information systems are completely separate; production data will not be transmitted to nor maintained in the national identification databases.
6. How much will the program cost and who will pay?
The plan for the program is currently being developed. Initial start-up costs will be different than the costs of a fully operational system in all 50 states. It is anticipated that the federal government and all industry stakeholders will share in the costs of an identification system.
7. Where do I get a premises ID?
The administration and maintenance of premises ID lies with each state’s department of Agriculture. State departments will use a national mechanism to obtain a unique national premises ID, and will record additional information such as type of premises, contact name, address, and phone number to contact the person in charge of a premises. Key pieces of information will be sent to the national premises database that can be used in the case of a disease trace-back.
8. What forms of identification will be used?
The form of animal identification used is intended to optimize accuracy, promote efficient information transfer, and be practical and effective in its application for individual species and/or industries. Species groups will have the choice of designing a system that may or may not use accompanying visible ID. For example, the cattle industry plans to use radio frequency identification (RFID) technology using an eartag attachment. Other species are exploring methods suitable for their industries, although effective official identification methods as described in the 9 Code of Federal Regulations will be maintained for certain species. Electronic identification may be necessary for efficient and accurate data collection and animal tracking in some species or in particular animal movement scenarios. Official identification tags will not replace management ear tags unless the species groups establish those options. Ultimately it is anticipated that technological advances will allow for one tag or ID device that performs multiple functions. Implants (i.e., microchips) may be permitted for certain species in which no other form of ID is suitable and assuming that the implant site has been approved by the FDA and FSIS relative to ease of discovery at slaughter when appropriate.
9. Where do I get an official ID tag or device?
It is expected that tags will be available from a number of sources, including DHIA.
10. Who will be responsible for ID application in livestock?
Producers are responsible for identifying animals. The livestock will need to be identified before they leave whatever premises they are on regardless of where they were born. Ultimately, identifying animals will be the responsibility of the "premises of birth" producers.
11. What data will be required to be kept, by whom and in what form?
It is anticipated that the final plan will be user-friendly such that it will be easy for all stakeholders to implement and make part of their daily practice. Ideally animal movements will be electronically tracked and sent from the stakeholders to the central database. For the plan to be successful, this key part, i.e. data entry, will need to be easy to follow, thus achievable in real-time such that data entry becomes a routine management practice.
Only essential information will be reported to the central database. In the case of individual animals, this is: 1) an US AIN (US Animal Identification Number), 2) the premises ID that the US AIN was seen at or allocated to, and 3) the date it was seen or allocated. The goal of the work plan is to work with existing information systems so additional recording of information by producers and auction markets is minimized.
12. Who will have access to information in the National Animal ID Databases?
Only state and federal health officials will have access to the premises and animal ID information when performing their duties to maintain the health of the national herd. Proper safeguards are being researched and are expected to be put in place to ensure that the data is protected from public disclosure.
13. What species are included in the program?
Currently, the species include beef, dairy, swine, and sheep. It is anticipated that equine, aquaculture, poultry, goats, camelids, cervids and any other species deemed necessary to protect animal agriculture will be included in the future.
14. Will this be a mandatory program?
Efforts are geared toward developing a national animal identification program that will provide for the ability to rapidly track animals exposed to a disease concern, and will meet the needs of producers, animal industries, domestic and international markets and consumers. The plan still needs to be completed and the system needs to be tested to be sure it is effective and workable. Incremental implementation of the plan as development continues will allow for potential problems within the system to be identified and the plan modified to address those problems. Ultimately there needs to be full compliance for the system to work as effectively as it should. Once the USAIP has been finalized, considered workable and accepted by industry, it is likely that industry and market forces will drive the process towards full compliance. At that time, USDA will work with industry and state partners to achieve full participation with the NAIS.
15. What are the liability issues of this program for producers?
Producers are, and have always been responsible for the livestock they produce. If practices are employed that would endanger consumers at any level the producer responsible for creating that threat could have increased liability. Merely having the animals Identified through the NAIS will neither increase nor decrease that liability.
Effective traceability can help protect producers who apply best management practices. The system can help limit liability and narrow the scope of eradication efforts in the case of a disease emergency by being able to document that appropriate and responsible measures were followed.
16. What is the timeline for implementing this program?
Several steps need to be completed before the NAIS could be fully implemented, however the USAIP recommends that:
These standards will apply to all animals in commerce within the represented industries regardless of their intended use as seedstock, commercial, pets or other personal uses.